Find Lawmaker by Name:
Filter Member by Party:
Filter Member by Chamber:
A
Top score — Tony Tinderholt
F
Lowest score — Eugene “Gene” Wu
48.5 pts
Gap between party medians
180 / 180
Members rated (met vote threshold)
Rank ↓
Member
Rating
1.
A (94.85%)
2.
A (94.00%)
3.
A (92.86%)
4.
A (91.84%)
5.
A (90.91%)
6.
A (90.72%)
7.
A (90.32%)
8.
A (89.69%)
9.
A (89.58%)
10.
B (88.89%)
11.
B (88.78%)
12.
B (88.00%)
13.
B (87.00%)
14.
B (86.60%)
15.
B (86.05%)
16.
B (86.00%)
17.
B (85.86%)
18.
B (83.67%)
19.
B (82.02%)
20.
B (81.00%)
21.
C (78.57%)
22.
C (76.53%)
23.
C (75.76%)
24.
C (75.51%)
25.
C (75.00%)
26.
C (73.91%)
27.
C (73.40%)
28.
C (73.00%)
29.
C (72.73%)
29.
C (72.73%)
31.
C (72.16%)
31.
C (72.16%)
33.
C (72.00%)
33.
C (72.00%)
35.
C (71.88%)
35.
C (71.88%)
37.
C (71.72%)
38.
C (71.43%)
39.
C (71.13%)
39.
C (71.13%)
39.
C (71.13%)
39.
C (71.13%)
43.
C (71.00%)
44.
C (70.93%)
45.
C (70.83%)
46.
C (70.71%)
47.
C (70.65%)
48.
C (70.10%)
48.
C (70.10%)
50.
C (70.00%)
51.
D (69.39%)
52.
D (69.07%)
52.
D (69.07%)
52.
D (69.07%)
55.
D (68.42%)
56.
D (67.68%)
56.
D (67.68%)
58.
D (67.37%)
59.
D (67.01%)
60.
D (66.33%)
61.
D (66.00%)
62.
D (65.98%)
62.
D (65.98%)
62.
D (65.98%)
65.
D (65.66%)
66.
D (64.65%)
67.
D (64.58%)
68.
D (64.29%)
68.
D (64.29%)
70.
D (64.04%)
71.
D (63.83%)
72.
D (63.51%)
73.
D (63.27%)
74.
D (63.16%)
75.
D (63.00%)
76.
D (62.63%)
77.
D (62.24%)
77.
D (62.24%)
79.
D (61.86%)
80.
D (61.62%)
80.
D (61.62%)
82.
D (60.61%)
83.
D (60.00%)
83.
D (60.00%)
85.
D (59.57%)
86.
F (59.18%)
87.
F (59.00%)
88.
F (58.76%)
89.
F (58.70%)
90.
F (58.59%)
91.
F (58.33%)
91.
F (58.33%)
93.
F (58.16%)
94.
F (57.58%)
94.
F (57.58%)
96.
F (57.00%)
97.
F (56.70%)
97.
F (56.70%)
99.
F (55.67%)
100.
F (55.10%)
100.
F (55.10%)
102.
F (55.00%)
103.
F (54.76%)
104.
F (40.40%)
105.
F (39.39%)
106.
F (39.18%)
107.
F (36.00%)
108.
F (34.02%)
109.
F (33.33%)
110.
F (32.61%)
111.
F (32.58%)
112.
F (31.58%)
112.
F (31.58%)
114.
F (31.18%)
115.
F (31.00%)
116.
F (30.19%)
117.
F (30.11%)
118.
F (27.59%)
119.
F (27.37%)
120.
F (26.83%)
121.
F (26.09%)
122.
F (25.77%)
123.
F (25.00%)
123.
F (25.00%)
123.
F (25.00%)
126.
F (24.74%)
127.
F (24.49%)
128.
F (23.47%)
129.
F (23.23%)
130.
F (23.16%)
131.
F (22.92%)
132.
F (22.68%)
132.
F (22.68%)
134.
F (22.22%)
134.
F (22.22%)
136.
F (21.84%)
137.
F (21.65%)
138.
F (21.51%)
139.
F (21.43%)
140.
F (21.21%)
141.
F (21.11%)
142.
F (20.83%)
143.
F (20.62%)
144.
F (20.20%)
144.
F (20.20%)
146.
F (20.00%)
146.
F (20.00%)
146.
F (20.00%)
149.
F (19.39%)
150.
F (19.19%)
151.
F (18.95%)
152.
F (18.75%)
153.
F (18.56%)
154.
F (18.48%)
155.
F (18.39%)
156.
F (18.28%)
157.
F (18.18%)
158.
F (18.09%)
159.
F (18.00%)
159.
F (18.00%)
161.
F (17.89%)
162.
F (17.78%)
162.
F (17.78%)
164.
F (17.71%)
164.
F (17.71%)
166.
F (17.39%)
167.
F (17.17%)
168.
F (16.67%)
169.
F (16.49%)
170.
F (16.16%)
170.
F (16.16%)
172.
F (16.00%)
172.
F (16.00%)
172.
F (16.00%)
175.
F (15.56%)
176.
F (15.46%)
177.
F (15.31%)
177.
F (15.31%)
179.
F (15.00%)
180.
F (14.61%)
The FoundersPAC scorecard tracks constitutional and limited-government principles based on substantive votes cast by members of Congress and state legislators. Each lawmaker receives a score reflecting how often they voted in alignment with these positions.
Scores are calculated as the percentage of weighted substantive votes a lawmaker cast in alignment with Founders PAC's position. Bills are weighted by FoundersPAC's research team. See the methodology page for full details on weighting and the participation threshold for receiving a finalized rating.
A high score (90%+) means a lawmaker voted in alignment with Founders PAC's positions on nearly every substantive vote. A low score means they voted against Founders PAC's positions on most substantive votes. Lawmakers below the participation threshold are marked N/A.
Use the state and year filters above to narrow the leaderboard, or search by name. Each lawmaker's row links to their full profile, including a year-by-year voting record and category breakdown.